prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study
  Preuzmi
PDF 1.56 MB
Znanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (2022), 15; 9515. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159515
Kovačević, Tanja; Vrdoljak, Davorka; Jurić Petričević, Slavica; Buljan, Ivan; Sambunjak, Dario; Krznarić, Željko; Marušić, Ana; Jerončić, Ana

Citirajte ovaj rad

Kovačević, T., Vrdoljak, D., Jurić Petričević, S., Buljan, I., Sambunjak, D., Krznarić, Ž. ... Jerončić, A. (2022). Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19. (15). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159515

Kovačević, Tanja, et al. "Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, br. 15, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159515

Kovačević, Tanja, Davorka Vrdoljak, Slavica Jurić Petričević, Ivan Buljan, Dario Sambunjak, Željko Krznarić, Ana Marušić i Ana Jerončić. "Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, br. 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159515

Kovačević, T., et al. (2022) 'Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study', International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(15). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159515

Kovačević T, Vrdoljak D, Jurić Petričević S, Buljan I, Sambunjak D, Krznarić Ž, i sur.. Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health [Internet]. 2022. [pristupljeno 17.11.2024.];19(15). doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159515

T. Kovačević, et al., "Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study", International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, br. 15, 2022. [Online]. Dostupno na: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:266:435088. [Citirano: 17.11.2024.]

Za citiranje koristite ovu mrežnu adresu: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:266:435088
Prijavite se u repozitorij kako biste mogli spremiti objekt u svoju listu.
Podaci o radu
Naslov (engleski)Factors Associated with the Quality and Transparency of National Guidelines : A Mixed-Methods Study
AutorTanja Kovačević
AutorDavorka Vrdoljak
AutorSlavica Jurić Petričević
AutorIvan Buljan
AutorDario Sambunjak
AutorŽeljko Krznarić https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3758-4540
AutorAna Marušić https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6272-0917
AutorAna Jerončić
Autorova ustanova(Klinički bolnički centar Split)
Znanstveno / umjetničko
područje, polje i grana		BIOMEDICINA I ZDRAVSTVO
Javno zdravstvo i zdravstvena zaštita
Sažetak (engleski)
We assessed the methodological quality and transparency of all the national clinical practice guidelines that were published in Croatia up until 2017 and explored the factors associated with their quality rating. An in-depth quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed using rigorous methodology. We evaluated the guidelines using a validated AGREE II instrument with four raters; we used multiple linear regressions to identify the predictors of quality; and two focus groups, including guideline developers, to further explore the guideline development process. The majority of the guidelines (N = 74) were developed by medical societies. The guidelines' quality was rated low: the median standardized AGREE II score was low, 36% (IQR 28-42), and so were the overall-assessments. The aspects of the guidelines that were rated best were the "clarity of presentation" and the "scope and purpose" (median >= 59%); however, the other four domains received very low scores (15-33%). Overall, the guideline quality did not improve over time. The guidelines that were developed by medical societies scored significantly worse than those developed by governmental, or unofficial working groups (12-43% per domain). In focus group discussions, inadequate methodology, a lack of implementation systems in place, a lack of awareness about editorial independence, and broader expertise/perspectives in working groups were identified as factors behind the low scores. The factors identified as affecting the quality of the national guidelines may help stakeholders who are developing interventions and education programs aimed at improving guideline quality worldwide.
Ključne riječi (engleski)
Jezikengleski
Vrsta publikacijeZnanstveni rad - Izvorni znanstveni rad
Status objaveObjavljen
Vrsta recenzijeRecenziran - međunarodna recenzija
Verzija publikacijeObjavljena verzija rada (izdavačev PDF)
Naslov časopisaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Brojčani podacivol. 19, br. 15, 9515
e-ISSN1660-4601
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19159515
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:266:435088
Datum objave publikacije2022
URL dokumentahttps://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/15/9515/pdf?version=1659510442
Vrsta resursaTekst
Prava pristupaOtvoreni pristup
Uvjeti korištenjaIkona licence Zaštićeno autorskim pravom.
Datum i vrijeme pohrane2022-09-02 17:47:29